Study record

Mitochondrial peptide MOTS-c suppresses systemic and cardiac inflammasome activation in a diabetic rat model

Mills AR, de Souza A, Pham T et al. · Exp Physiol · 2026

AnimalMOTS-c administeredEvidence tier C

What this study reported

Reported that administered MOTS-c was associated with lower fasting blood glucose and circulating C-reactive protein and with selective changes in plasma IL-10 and IL-1beta in diabetic rats. Reported lower NLRP3, ASC and cleaved caspase-1 staining in left ventricular tissue after MOTS-c administration.

Limitations

Male rats only in a single chemically induced diabetes model, with group sizes not reported in the abstract; immunohistochemistry is semi-quantitative and no cardiac functional endpoints were reported.

Study record

Annotated fields for this study
Study modelAnimal study (in vivo)
Substance studiedMOTS-c administeredSynthetic MOTS-c was given to cells, animals or people.
Speciesrat
System studiedMale Sprague-Dawley rats with high-fat diet and streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes
PopulationNot reported
DesignControlled animal experiment
Sample size as reportednot reported
Control groupuntreated diabetic rats
Route (data field only)Not reported
Endpoints measuredfasting blood glucose; C-reactive protein; plasma IL-10 and IL-1beta; left ventricular NLRP3, ASC and cleaved caspase-1; lipid and uric acid measures
Pathways measuredInflammation · Insulin & glucose handling
Research areasCardiovascular · Metabolic · Inflammation & immunity
Evidence tierC — Animal in vivo
Publication typesJournal Article

Appraisal

Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.

Relevance to MOTS-c
Direct
Model applicability
Mammalian
Sample size
Not reported
Controls
Appropriate
Outcome validity
Surrogate
Support for its own conclusion
Moderate

Provenance

  • Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
  • Annotated from the published abstract.
  • Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
  • Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.