Study record

MOTS-c partially protects against skeletal muscle deterioration in C26 cachexia

Jamnick NA, Livingston PD, Gammon CJ et al. · Front Med (Lausanne) · 2026

AnimalMOTS-c administeredEvidence tier CAlso: Cell study (in vitro)

What this study reported

Reported that tumour-bearing mice lost body weight and that administered MOTS-c was not associated with preservation of total body weight or fat mass but was associated with preserved quadriceps mass, with a trend for gastrocnemius mass and EDL function. Reported attenuated Atrogin-1 and MuRF1 upregulation, increased inhibitory pFOXO1, reduced pFOXO3a and partial restoration of PGC-1alpha in muscle, and increased PGC-1alpha mRNA and AMPK phosphorylation in myotubes.

Limitations

Male mice in a single aggressive tumour cachexia model with group sizes not reported in the abstract; effects were partial and some endpoints only trended; survival and function were assessed narrowly.

Study record

Annotated fields for this study
Study modelAnimal study (in vivo)
Substance studiedMOTS-c administeredSynthetic MOTS-c was given to cells, animals or people.
Speciesmouse
System studiedMale mice bearing Colon-26 carcinoma; differentiated myotubes in culture
PopulationNot reported
DesignControlled animal experiment with cell culture experiments
Sample size as reportednot reported
Control groupvehicle-treated tumour-bearing mice
Route (data field only)intraperitoneal
Endpoints measuredbody weight and fat mass; skeletal muscle mass (quadriceps, gastrocnemius); EDL muscle function; atrogene expression (MuRF1, Atrogin-1); FOXO signalling; PGC-1alpha
Pathways measuredAMPK signalling · AKT / mTOR / FOXO · SIRT1 / PGC-1α / biogenesis
Research areasSkeletal muscle · Cancer · Metabolic · Mitochondrial biology
Evidence tierC — Animal in vivo
Publication typesJournal Article

Appraisal

Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.

Relevance to MOTS-c
Direct
Model applicability
Mammalian
Sample size
Not reported
Controls
Appropriate
Outcome validity
Surrogate
Support for its own conclusion
Moderate

Provenance

  • Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
  • Annotated from the published abstract.
  • Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
  • Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.