Study record

MOTS-c, a mitochondrial-derived peptide, ameliorates lysosomal membrane permeability and improves survival of soft tissue transplantation

Shi J, Wu Y, Liu X et al. · Autophagy · 2026

AnimalMOTS-c administeredEvidence tier CAlso: Cell study (in vitro)

What this study reported

Reported that administered MOTS-c was associated with greater flap survival, improved perfusion, more angiogenesis, reduced endothelial pyroptosis, increased autophagy and reduced lysosomal membrane permeabilisation in ischemic mouse flaps. Reported that MOTS-c suppressed PLA2G4A phosphorylation through MAPK1-MAPK3-NFKB signalling, with PLA2G4A overexpression reversing these changes.

Limitations

Male mice only with group sizes not reported in the abstract; a single surgical ischemia model; mechanism inferred from overexpression rather than genetic deletion.

Study record

Annotated fields for this study
Study modelAnimal study (in vivo)
Substance studiedMOTS-c administeredSynthetic MOTS-c was given to cells, animals or people.
Speciesmouse, human
System studiedIschemic skin flaps in male C57BL/6 mice with AAV-mediated PLA2G4A overexpression; endothelial cells in culture
PopulationNot reported
DesignControlled animal experiment with RNA sequencing and cell culture experiments
Sample size as reportednot reported
Control groupuntreated ischemic flap animals
Route (data field only)Not reported
Endpoints measuredflap survival; blood flow perfusion; angiogenesis and collagen remodelling; endothelial pyroptosis; autophagy and lysosomal membrane permeabilisation; MAPK1-MAPK3-NFKB and PLA2G4A signalling
Pathways measuredAutophagy / mitophagy · MAPK signalling · Inflammation · Oxidative stress
Research areasCardiovascular · Mitochondrial biology · Inflammation & immunity
Evidence tierC — Animal in vivo
Publication typesJournal Article

Appraisal

Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.

Relevance to MOTS-c
Direct
Model applicability
Mammalian
Sample size
Not reported
Controls
Appropriate
Outcome validity
Surrogate
Support for its own conclusion
Moderate

Provenance

  • Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
  • Annotated from the published abstract.
  • Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
  • Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.