Study record

Safety and Efficacy of Approved and Unapproved Peptide Therapies for Musculoskeletal Injuries and Athletic Performance

Mendias CL, Awan TM · Sports Med · 2026

ReviewMOTS-c administeredEvidence tier R

What this study reported

Reviewed the mechanisms, reported safety information and regulatory status of a set of peptides marketed to patients, including MOTS-c, and noted that many unapproved peptides show tissue repair or metabolic outcomes in animal models while rigorous human data are scarce.

Limitations

Narrative review covering many compounds, so MOTS-c receives limited depth; no systematic search or quality grading of the underlying studies.

Study record

Annotated fields for this study
Study modelReview
Substance studiedMOTS-c administeredSynthetic MOTS-c was given to cells, animals or people.
SpeciesNot reported
System studiedNarrative review of approved and unapproved peptides marketed in sports medicine, MOTS-c among them
PopulationNot reported
DesignNarrative review
Sample size as reportedNot reported
Control groupNot reported
Route (data field only)Not reported
Endpoints measuredpharmacological mechanisms; reported safety profiles; regulatory status
Pathways measuredNot reported
Research areasSkeletal muscle · Exercise · Methods
Evidence tierR — Review (context, not evidence)
Publication typesJournal Article, Review

Appraisal

Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.

Relevance to MOTS-c
Peripheral
Model applicability
n/a
Sample size
n/a
Controls
n/a
Outcome validity
n/a
Support for its own conclusion
n/a

Provenance

  • Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
  • Annotated from the published abstract.
  • Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
  • Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.