Study record

Reduced serum and skeletal muscle MOTS c levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome are associated with mitochondrial dysfunction

Kutuk IS, Akin S, Demirel H et al. · Sci Rep · 2026

Human obs.Endogenous MOTS-c measuredEvidence tier B

What this study reported

Measured lower circulating MOTS-c concentrations and lower skeletal muscle MOTS-c expression in women with polycystic ovary syndrome than in matched controls. Reported that serum MOTS-c was inversely associated with total testosterone and total cholesterol in this cohort.

Limitations

Cross-sectional case-control design cannot establish direction; muscle expression was assessed only in a subgroup; single-centre sample of women with weak correlation coefficients.

Study record

Annotated fields for this study
Study modelHuman observational
Substance studiedEndogenous MOTS-c measuredNaturally occurring MOTS-c was measured; nothing was given.
Specieshuman
System studiedWomen with polycystic ovary syndrome and age- and BMI-matched controls; serum ELISA and vastus lateralis biopsies
Populationwomen with polycystic ovary syndrome and age- and BMI-matched healthy controls
DesignCase-control study
Sample size as reported40 women with PCOS and 40 controls
Control groupage- and BMI-matched healthy women
Route (data field only)Not reported
Endpoints measuredserum MOTS-c concentration; skeletal muscle MOTS-c expression; total testosterone; total cholesterol; insulin resistance measures
Pathways measuredInsulin & glucose handling · Other
Research areasMetabolic · Reproductive · Mitochondrial biology · Skeletal muscle
Evidence tierB — Other human study
Publication typesJournal Article

Appraisal

Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.

Relevance to MOTS-c
Direct
Model applicability
Human
Sample size
Small
Controls
Appropriate
Outcome validity
Validated biomarker
Support for its own conclusion
Moderate

Provenance

  • Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
  • Annotated from the published abstract.
  • Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
  • Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.