Study record
Mitochondria-derived peptide MOTS-c restores mitochondrial respiration in type 2 diabetic heart
Pham T, Taberner A, Hickey A et al. · Front Physiol · 2025
What this study reported
Measured cardiac mitochondrial bioenergetics in a rat model of diet- and streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes and reported that untreated diabetic rats had hyperglycaemia, poor glucose control, left ventricular hypertrophy and decreased oxygen flux at oxidative phosphorylation, with unchanged ROS, ATP production and hydrolysis rates. Reported that diabetic rats given MOTS-c had lower fasting glucose, improved glucose homeostasis and a lesser degree of cardiac hypertrophy, and that their cardiac mitochondria showed increased OXPHOS respiration, increased ROS levels and a decreased ATP hydrolysis rate under anoxic conditions.
Limitations
Group sizes, sex and randomisation are not reported in the abstract; a single chemically induced diabetes model; endpoints are tissue-homogenate surrogates rather than in vivo cardiac function, and the reported increase in ROS is not reconciled with the stated benefit.
Study record
| Study model | Animal study (in vivo) |
|---|---|
| Substance studied | MOTS-c administeredSynthetic MOTS-c was given to cells, animals or people. |
| Species | rat |
| System studied | Rats with high-fat-diet and streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes; cardiac tissue homogenates studied by respirometry |
| Population | Not reported |
| Design | Controlled animal experiment with ex vivo cardiac respirometry |
| Sample size as reported | not reported |
| Control group | untreated diabetic rats and non-diabetic control rats |
| Route (data field only) | Not reported |
| Endpoints measured | mitochondrial oxygen flux (OXPHOS); ATP production and hydrolysis; reactive oxygen species production; fasting glucose; glucose homeostasis; left ventricular hypertrophy |
| Pathways measured | Insulin & glucose handling · Oxidative stress |
| Research areas | Cardiovascular · Metabolic · Mitochondrial biology |
| Evidence tier | C — Animal in vivo |
| Publication types | Journal Article |
Appraisal
Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.
- Relevance to MOTS-c
- Direct
- Model applicability
- Mammalian
- Sample size
- Not reported
- Controls
- Appropriate
- Outcome validity
- Surrogate
- Support for its own conclusion
- Moderate
Provenance
- Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
- Annotated from the published abstract.
- Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
- Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.