Study record

Mitochondria-derived peptide MOTS-c restores mitochondrial respiration in type 2 diabetic heart

Pham T, Taberner A, Hickey A et al. · Front Physiol · 2025

AnimalMOTS-c administeredEvidence tier C

What this study reported

Measured cardiac mitochondrial bioenergetics in a rat model of diet- and streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes and reported that untreated diabetic rats had hyperglycaemia, poor glucose control, left ventricular hypertrophy and decreased oxygen flux at oxidative phosphorylation, with unchanged ROS, ATP production and hydrolysis rates. Reported that diabetic rats given MOTS-c had lower fasting glucose, improved glucose homeostasis and a lesser degree of cardiac hypertrophy, and that their cardiac mitochondria showed increased OXPHOS respiration, increased ROS levels and a decreased ATP hydrolysis rate under anoxic conditions.

Limitations

Group sizes, sex and randomisation are not reported in the abstract; a single chemically induced diabetes model; endpoints are tissue-homogenate surrogates rather than in vivo cardiac function, and the reported increase in ROS is not reconciled with the stated benefit.

Study record

Annotated fields for this study
Study modelAnimal study (in vivo)
Substance studiedMOTS-c administeredSynthetic MOTS-c was given to cells, animals or people.
Speciesrat
System studiedRats with high-fat-diet and streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetes; cardiac tissue homogenates studied by respirometry
PopulationNot reported
DesignControlled animal experiment with ex vivo cardiac respirometry
Sample size as reportednot reported
Control groupuntreated diabetic rats and non-diabetic control rats
Route (data field only)Not reported
Endpoints measuredmitochondrial oxygen flux (OXPHOS); ATP production and hydrolysis; reactive oxygen species production; fasting glucose; glucose homeostasis; left ventricular hypertrophy
Pathways measuredInsulin & glucose handling · Oxidative stress
Research areasCardiovascular · Metabolic · Mitochondrial biology
Evidence tierC — Animal in vivo
Publication typesJournal Article

Appraisal

Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.

Relevance to MOTS-c
Direct
Model applicability
Mammalian
Sample size
Not reported
Controls
Appropriate
Outcome validity
Surrogate
Support for its own conclusion
Moderate

Provenance

  • Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
  • Annotated from the published abstract.
  • Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
  • Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.