Study record

Alterations in circulating mitochondrial signals at hospital admission for COPD exacerbation

Amado CA, Martín-Audera P, Agüero J et al. · Chron Respir Dis · 2023

Human obs.Endogenous MOTS-c measuredEvidence tier B

What this study reported

Measured lower serum MOTS-c in patients admitted for COPD exacerbation than in patients with stable COPD, with a reported area under the curve of 0.744 for distinguishing the two groups. MOTS-c above the group mean was reported as an independent risk factor for re-admission over one year of follow-up.

Limitations

Single-centre study with a small exacerbation group and unequal group sizes; MOTS-c sampled only at admission, so the direction of the relationship cannot be established.

Study record

Annotated fields for this study
Study modelHuman observational
Substance studiedEndogenous MOTS-c measuredNaturally occurring MOTS-c was measured; nothing was given.
Specieshuman
System studiedSerum mitochondrial peptides in patients hospitalised for COPD exacerbation and outpatients with stable COPD
Populationpatients admitted to hospital for COPD exacerbation and outpatients with stable COPD
DesignProspective cohort with case-control comparison
Sample size as reported211 participants (51 exacerbation, 160 stable COPD)
Control groupoutpatients with stable COPD
Route (data field only)Not reported
Endpoints measuredserum MOTS-c; serum humanin, FGF-21, GDF-15 and Romo1; diagnostic accuracy for exacerbation; re-admission during follow-up
Pathways measuredNot reported
Research areasLung · Mitochondrial biology
Evidence tierB — Other human study
Publication typesJournal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Appraisal

Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.

Relevance to MOTS-c
Direct
Model applicability
Human
Sample size
Small
Controls
Appropriate
Outcome validity
Surrogate
Support for its own conclusion
Moderate

Provenance

  • Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
  • Annotated from the published abstract.
  • Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
  • Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.