Study record

The role of MOTS-c-mediated antioxidant defense in aerobic exercise alleviating diabetic myocardial injury

Tang M, Su Q, Duan Y et al. · Sci Rep · 2023

AnimalMOTS-c administeredEvidence tier C

What this study reported

Compared administered MOTS-c, aerobic treadmill training and their combination in a rat model of type 2 diabetes. Reported that MOTS-c, with or without exercise, was associated with reduced myocardial ultrastructural damage and with changes in glucolipid metabolism and cardiac function in these rats, and with increased SOD and CAT and increased myocardial MOTS-c, Keap1, Nrf2 and p-AMPK protein expression; the combination reduced myocardial MDA and increased p-AMPK more than either alone.

Limitations

Group sizes and animal sex not reported in the abstract; a single chemically and diet-induced rat diabetes model; outcomes are ultrastructural and biochemical surrogates, and antioxidant markers were assessed by colorimetric methods and Western blot without blinding reported.

Study record

Annotated fields for this study
Study modelAnimal study (in vivo)
Substance studiedMOTS-c administeredSynthetic MOTS-c was given to cells, animals or people.
Speciesrat
System studiedRat model of type 2 diabetes induced by high-fat diet plus low-dose streptozotocin; myocardium analysed
PopulationNot reported
DesignControlled animal experiment
Sample size as reportednot reported
Control groupuntreated diabetic rats; aerobic exercise training and combined MOTS-c plus exercise comparison groups
Route (data field only)intraperitoneal
Endpoints measuredmyocardial ultrastructure; cardiac function; glucolipid metabolism; myocardial MDA, SOD, GSH and CAT; MOTS-c, Keap1, Nrf2, AMPK and p-AMPK protein expression
Pathways measuredNRF2 / antioxidant response · AMPK signalling · Oxidative stress
Research areasCardiovascular · Metabolic · Exercise
Evidence tierC — Animal in vivo
Publication typesJournal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Appraisal

Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.

Relevance to MOTS-c
Direct
Model applicability
Mammalian
Sample size
Not reported
Controls
Appropriate
Outcome validity
Surrogate
Support for its own conclusion
Moderate

Provenance

  • Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
  • Annotated from the published abstract.
  • Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
  • Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.