Study record
The relationship of circulating MOTS-c level with liver fibrosis and metabolic components in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease
Kirik A, Dogru T, Yanik B et al. · Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci · 2023
What this study reported
Measured circulating MOTS-c by ELISA in adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and in healthy controls. Found significantly lower MOTS-c levels in participants with MAFLD than in controls and in those with metabolic syndrome than in those without, and reported that MOTS-c levels correlated negatively with the presence of MAFLD, the NAFLD fibrosis score, FIB-4 and components of metabolic syndrome.
Limitations
Cross-sectional single-centre design cannot establish temporality; fatty liver defined by ultrasound and fibrosis by noninvasive scores rather than biopsy; groups differed in median age and the control group was smaller.
Study record
| Study model | Human observational |
|---|---|
| Substance studied | Endogenous MOTS-c measuredNaturally occurring MOTS-c was measured; nothing was given. |
| Species | human |
| System studied | Single-centre cohort with liver ultrasound classification; serum MOTS-c by ELISA and noninvasive fibrosis scores |
| Population | Adults with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and healthy controls |
| Design | Single-centre cross-sectional study |
| Sample size as reported | 234 participants (150 with MAFLD, 84 healthy controls) |
| Control group | healthy controls without fatty liver on ultrasound |
| Route (data field only) | Not reported |
| Endpoints measured | circulating MOTS-c level; NAFLD fibrosis score; FIB-4 score; metabolic syndrome components |
| Pathways measured | Lipid metabolism · Insulin & glucose handling |
| Research areas | Liver · Metabolic |
| Evidence tier | B — Other human study |
| Publication types | Journal Article |
Appraisal
Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.
- Relevance to MOTS-c
- Direct
- Model applicability
- Human
- Sample size
- Adequate
- Controls
- Appropriate
- Outcome validity
- Surrogate
- Support for its own conclusion
- Moderate
Provenance
- Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
- Annotated from the published abstract.
- Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
- Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.