Study record

Effects of intracerebroventricular MOTS-c infusion on thyroid hormones and uncoupling proteins

Bahar MR, Tekin S, Beytur A et al. · Biol Futur · 2023

AnimalMOTS-c administeredEvidence tier C

What this study reported

Measured food intake, body weight, thyroid hormones and uncoupling proteins in male Wistar rats given MOTS-c by intracerebroventricular infusion. Reported higher food consumption with no change in body weight, lower serum TSH, T3 and T4, and higher UCP1 and UCP3 levels in peripheral tissues of these rats compared with control and sham groups.

Limitations

Males only, a single rat strain and 10 animals per group; central infusion is not comparable to peripheral exposure; endpoints are hormone and protein surrogates measured at one time point with no energy-expenditure measurement.

Study record

Annotated fields for this study
Study modelAnimal study (in vivo)
Substance studiedMOTS-c administeredSynthetic MOTS-c was given to cells, animals or people.
Speciesrat
System studiedMale Wistar Albino rats in four groups: control, sham, and two MOTS-c infusion groups; hypothalamus, blood, muscle and adipose tissue sampled
PopulationNot reported
DesignControlled animal experiment with intracerebroventricular infusion
Sample size as reported40 male Wistar Albino rats (10 per group)
Control groupuntreated control and sham-infused rats
Route (data field only)intracerebroventricular
Endpoints measuredfood consumption; body weight; serum TSH, T3 and T4; hypothalamic TRH expression; UCP1 and UCP3 in muscle and adipose tissue
Pathways measuredThermogenesis / brown fat · Other
Research areasMetabolic · Nervous system
Evidence tierC — Animal in vivo
Publication typesJournal Article

Appraisal

Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.

Relevance to MOTS-c
Direct
Model applicability
Mammalian
Sample size
Small
Controls
Appropriate
Outcome validity
Surrogate
Support for its own conclusion
Moderate

Provenance

  • Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
  • Annotated from the published abstract.
  • Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
  • Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.