Study record

Racial differences in circulating mitochondria-derived peptides may contribute to prostate cancer health disparities

Ramirez-Torres A, Reagan AL, Howard LE et al. · Prostate · 2022

Human obs.SeveralEvidence tier B

What this study reported

Measured three mitochondria-derived peptides in men undergoing prostate biopsy and reported that among controls MOTS-c and SHLP2 were lower in African American than European American men, while humanin was similar. Reported that in European American men higher peptide levels were associated with lower odds of prostate cancer and of both low- and high-grade disease, with null associations in African American men after adjustment for age, body mass index, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen.

Limitations

Modest numbers within each race-by-case stratum; single biopsy-based cross-sectional sampling with no repeat measures; race-stratified subgroup comparisons; MOTS-c is one of three peptides and not the primary focus.

Study record

Annotated fields for this study
Study modelHuman observational
Substance studiedSeveralMore than one of these is central to the paper (common for reviews).
Specieshuman
System studiedMen undergoing prostate biopsy; plasma SHLP2, humanin and MOTS-c compared by race and biopsy outcome
PopulationAfrican American and European American men undergoing prostate biopsy, with and without a prostate cancer diagnosis
DesignCase-control study
Sample size as reported198 men (50 EAM and 49 AAM cases; 50 EAM and 49 AAM controls)
Control groupMen undergoing biopsy without a prostate cancer diagnosis
Route (data field only)Not reported
Endpoints measuredplasma MOTS-c; plasma humanin; plasma SHLP2; prostate cancer diagnosis; tumour grade group
Pathways measuredNot reported
Research areasCancer · Mitochondrial biology
Evidence tierB — Other human study
Publication typesJournal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Appraisal

Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.

Relevance to MOTS-c
Direct
Model applicability
Human
Sample size
Small
Controls
Appropriate
Outcome validity
Clinical outcome
Support for its own conclusion
Moderate

Provenance

  • Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
  • Annotated from the published abstract.
  • Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
  • Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.