Study record

MOTS-c inhibits Osteolysis in the Mouse Calvaria by affecting osteocyte-osteoclast crosstalk and inhibiting inflammation

Yan Z, Zhu S, Wang H et al. · Pharmacol Res · 2019

AnimalMOTS-c administeredEvidence tier CAlso: Cell study (in vitro)

What this study reported

In a mouse particle-induced calvarial osteolysis model, MOTS-c treatment was associated with less bone erosion and inflammation. In culture, MOTS-c increased the OPG/RANKL ratio in osteocytes and reduced particle-triggered STAT1 and NF-κB phosphorylation in bone marrow macrophages, effects blocked by promoting ROS or suppressing PGC-1α via AMPK repression.

Limitations

Males only in a single implant-particle model; group sizes not reported in the abstract.

Study record

Annotated fields for this study
Study modelAnimal study (in vivo)
Substance studiedMOTS-c administeredSynthetic MOTS-c was given to cells, animals or people.
Speciesmouse
System studiedMale C57BL/6 mice with UHMWPE particle-induced calvarial osteolysis; osteocytes and primary bone marrow macrophages
PopulationNot reported
DesignControlled animal experiment with cell culture experiments
Sample size as reportedNot reported
Control groupparticle-challenged mice not given MOTS-c (implied); ROS promotion and AMPK repression experiments
Route (data field only)Not reported
Endpoints measuredbone erosion; inflammation; OPG/RANKL ratio; osteoclastogenesis; STAT1 and NF-κB phosphorylation
Pathways measuredInflammation · AMPK signalling · SIRT1 / PGC-1α / biogenesis · Oxidative stress
Research areasBone · Inflammation & immunity
Evidence tierC — Animal in vivo
Publication typesJournal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Appraisal

Each dimension is recorded separately and never combined into a single score. A study can be well controlled and still tell you little about people.

Relevance to MOTS-c
Direct
Model applicability
Mammalian
Sample size
Not reported
Controls
Appropriate
Outcome validity
Surrogate
Support for its own conclusion
Moderate

Provenance

  • Bibliographic fields retrieved from PubMed E-utilities efetch (title, journal, date, authors, DOI) on 2026-11-11.
  • Annotated from the published abstract.
  • Editorial review: approved (2026-11-11).
  • Classification follows the site methodology; the record describes the study, not what MOTS-c does in people.